Attachments: No Attachments
All key elements of the assignment are covered in a substantive way.
A peer-reviewed journal article (from the past five years) on a program evaluation is critiqued.
The evaluation process in the article is described.
The evaluation tools are described.
The evaluation recommendations or policy arguments are summarized
The conclusion of the author(s) is discussed.
Paragraph transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the memo.
The tone is appropriate to the content and assignment.
Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Sentences are well constructed, strong, and varied.
Sentence transitions are present and maintain the flow of thought.
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page.
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed.
Spelling is correct.